No Widgets found in the Sidebar
Is a Science Podcast Necessary for Survival? | Science 2.0

The Science 2.0 movement brought about a significant change in the cultural sphere, with blogging becoming a popular activity among scientists. This trend eventually led to corporate media offering contracts to scientists and user-generated content being explored by the BBC. However, as time passed, social media emerged as the new platform for sharing information. While it revolutionized journalism, social media did not necessarily contribute to scientific knowledge creation or peer review.

In contrast, pay-to-publish journals that claimed to be peer-reviewed inundated scientists with an overwhelming amount of information. Now, a new book suggests that scholarly podcasting could be the next big trend in knowledge creation and review. Although podcasting has been around longer than Science 2.0, it is now considered a transformative way of creating and reviewing expert knowledge.

The authors of the book discuss the historical evolution of scholarly communication norms and speculate on the potential impact of new methods of knowledge creation. While celebrities like Joe Rogan and NFL’s Manning brothers have shown the power of podcasting, there are limitations to consider. For example, Google search algorithms will need to adapt to process audio content and establish credibility, while AI technology can easily generate audio content, posing challenges for listeners accustomed to reading scientific papers.

As we look towards the future, AI is now capable of generating content, making creation of a large language model (LLM) necessary to differentiate legitimate scientific research from epidemiology papers linking common chemicals to human diseases. Podcasting may just be the beginning of a new era in academic discourse.

Scholarly podcasting has emerged as an alternative form of knowledge creation and dissemination that has gained traction in recent years. This new trend offers exciting possibilities for academics who are looking for innovative ways to share their research with a wider audience.

One limitation that must be addressed is how Google search algorithms will handle audio content and establish credibility. Additionally, AI technology can easily generate audio content poses challenges for listeners who may not be accustomed to reading scientific papers.

Despite these challenges, scholars have shown that podcasting can be an effective way to engage audiences with complex topics and ideas.

Furthermore, experts predict that podcasting will continue to grow in popularity and become an integral part of academic discourse.

As such, it is important for scholars who are interested in using podcasts as a tool for knowledge creation and dissemination to keep up with advances in technology and best practices.

In conclusion, while blogging was once popular among scientists but eventually waned outwards social media became dominant platforms for sharing information but did not contribute much towards scientific knowledge creation or peer review.

However pay-to-publish journals claiming they were peer reviewed overloaded scientists with information which paved way for scholarly podcasting as the next big trend.

The authors have discussed historical evolution of scholarly communication norms and speculated on potential impact which makes us wonder if this medium can truly revolutionize how we view scholarly work?

By Samantha Jones

As a dedicated content writer at, I bring a unique blend of creativity and precision to my work. With a passion for storytelling and a keen eye for detail, I strive to craft engaging and informative articles that captivate our readers. From breaking news to thought-provoking features, I am committed to delivering content that resonates with our audience and keeps them coming back for more. Join me on this exciting journey as we explore the ever-evolving world of news and information together.

Leave a Reply