No Widgets found in the Sidebar
EPA Urged to Consider Industry’s Perspective on Science Policy Update

Industry groups are calling on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to take their views into account as the agency prepares to finalize an update to its scientific integrity policy. This update is of significant importance as it could cement President Joe Biden’s efforts to safeguard the agency’s research and prevent political interference from a potential second Trump administration. The finalized guidelines are expected to be released later this year.

Francesca Grifo, the scientific integrity official at EPA, acknowledged that the agency has received numerous comments from various sectors regarding the update. The policy in question outlines how the agency conducts its scientific research and has far-reaching implications for the regulated community. Grifo emphasized the significance of listening to all perspectives, particularly since the decisions made by the agency can have significant consequences.

Industry groups are advocating for their voices to be heard as EPA finalizes its scientific integrity policy. This policy update is critical in ensuring that the agency’s research efforts are protected and that its scientists are shielded from political interference. The decisions made by EPA will not only affect the agency but also have wide-ranging implications for the regulated community. In light of this, it is essential for EPA to consider all perspectives and potential impacts of its policies.

By Samantha Jones

As a dedicated content writer at, I bring a unique blend of creativity and precision to my work. With a passion for storytelling and a keen eye for detail, I strive to craft engaging and informative articles that captivate our readers. From breaking news to thought-provoking features, I am committed to delivering content that resonates with our audience and keeps them coming back for more. Join me on this exciting journey as we explore the ever-evolving world of news and information together.

Leave a Reply